The Moultrie News
 
Home | News | Education | Police Blotter | Sports | Travel | Celebrations | Classifieds | Health | Weather | Opinion | Print Edition | Photos | Video | Family | AP News
  
 
 
  Columns
  
  
  
 Printer friendly version  |   E-mail to a friend
  
Voter ID legislation: A fear-based approach
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
By Barbara Zia - President of the League of women Voters

On behalf of the League of Women Voters of South Carolina, I want to express our strong opposition to legislation, H3418, which is currently being debated in the legislature. H3418 would require voters to obtain and show a government issued photo ID before exercising their constitutional right to vote.

Photo ID requirements are one of the most serious threats in decades to our efforts to ensure the right of every eligible American to vote. Research shows that they encourage racial and ethnic discrimination at polling places, prevent eligible voters from participating in our democracy, limit turnout, and do very little to comb genuine instances of voters impersonating someone else at the polls.

The numbers of people who could be disenfranchised by this legislation is daunting. Up to 170,000 of your neighbors in South Carolina do not have valid photo identification. The burden will be greatest for the elderly, low-income, minority, homeless, or handicapped – for whom it is most cost prohibitive and inconvenient to take off work, get transportation, stand in line, and apply for the documentation. In many cases, these individuals don't have the underlying documentation that is needed to get a South Carolina ID.  In other words, this requirement would disenfranchise the very people who currently must work the hardest to vote at all.

Estimates put the cost of voter photo ID at over $1 million annually. This includes lost revenue from elimination of fees for DMV-supplied photo ID cards and additional training for poll workers. Not factored in are the considerable costs of legal challenges that South Carolina would incur.

At a time when education services are being cut for our children, why should taxpayers be forced to pay for this costly, unnecessary and suppressive legislation?

The right to vote, and to have that vote counted, is the most important civil right we have.

Photo ID requirements are one of the greatest threats to fair and equal voting rights today. State governments should be in the business of encouraging full participation of our citizenry, not developing ways to limit the right to vote.

Any proposal that raises barriers to voting is a fear-based approach instead of a fact-based solution.  For these reasons, the League hopes members of the South Carolina Legislature will do the right thing by opposing legislation that would require voter ID and instead focus on provisions that would help improve polling place operations, foster effective training and recruitment of poll workers, and make election administration more efficient, secure, accurate and recountable.

 
 

Notice about comments:
MoultrieNews.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. MoultrieNews.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not moultrienews.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
  

Comments
  




  
 
  Polls
How do you feel about Mount Pleasant Town Council looking into regulating cell phone usage while driving?
Yes, talking and texting while driving is dangerous and should be outlawed.
 
No, we do not need town officials babysitting us when it comes to safety.
 
Not sure, because while it is dangerous, it's not a top concern of mine.
 

Do you think the Town of Mount Pleasant should research the feasibilty of constructing and maintaining a mooring field.
No, this would put a strain on town resources.
 
Yes, this could be another source of economic revenue, promoting tourism and relocation.
 
Possibly, but it should be a shared endeavor between local, county and state governing officials.
 

   Weather
 
 
 
© 2009 Evening Post Publishing